Vlf Versus Pulse Induction Metal Detectors Review

Vlf Versus Pulse Induction Metal Detectors Review In the category treasure hunting more articles and learn more information about Vlf Versus Pulse Induction Metal Detectors Review Reviews Price Specifications Features Image manuals videos Accessories All this in metal detectors for gold.

Vlf Versus Pulse Induction Metal Detectors Review .Pulse Induction detectors against VLF- Pulse induction (PI) detectors preferably VLF detectors detector original technology . On sea beaches , because salt water produces a high background signal on the VLF machines , hard ground detector and provide a clear signal when metals are present . The pulse induction technology does not depend on this phenomenon, and these detectors must not be grounded before use.

Because soil mineralization VLF detectors should be sanded balanced. Without having to adjust the PI detector is especially useful in areas where salinity changes occur frequently.

Vlf Versus Pulse Induction Metal Detectors Review

People often say PI machines dig everything while VLF ( single frequency , usually) and BBS ( multi frequency ) detectors prefer to choose what they dig . It may just boil down to where you make your target search . In the case of saline waters that are rich in iron targets such as nails, etc. , it makes sense to select a detector like Excalibur BBS or Sovereign GT, to help distinguish , digging or eliminate these items.

How To Choose A Metal Detector / Pi Vs Vlf Review

If you make a treasure hunt on the dry sand , many users prefer the car because of the increased possibility of VLF find junk iron target. But the wet sand with a metal detector is best done with either PI or BBS- type machines because of the ability to overcome the background noise mineralization .